The answer to this question largely depends upon your conception of philosophy. He cites their contempt as the reason for his being put on trial. Rather than behave differently before a court, he continues to behave as he always has.
In a famous passage, Socrates likens himself to a gadfly stinging the lazy horse which is the Athenian state. Study Questions 1 Does Socrates make any philosophical assertions, and if so, of what kind are they?
Without him, Socrates claims, the state is liable to drift into a deep sleep, but through his influence--irritating as it may be to some--it can be wakened into productive and virtuous action. On a more serious note, he rejects prison and exile, offering perhaps instead to pay a fine.
This is certainly the rhetoric that Socrates employs, but his speech is so laden with irony that we should not be hasty to take his words at face value. Wisdom would not be so valuable if it were not so intimately connected to the good.
Recognizing his ignorance in most worldly affairs, Socrates concluded that he must be wiser than other men only in that he knows that he knows nothing. When the jury rejects his suggestion and sentences him to death, Socrates stoically accepts the verdict with the observation that no one but the gods know what happens after death and so it would be foolish to fear what one does not know.
Perhaps he also wants to have a deeper effect on the jury, to lead them to acknowledge the unjust state of affairs that persists in the deteriorating city- state. Arguments could be made for including both Nietzsche and Wittgenstein in this camp.
Socrates is quite explicit on this question. For the most part, Socrates speaks in a very plain, conversational manner. If anything, he serves as evidence in favor of the claim that knowledge helps us to avoid evil.
Socrates then proceeds to interrogate Meletus, the man primarily responsible for Platos apology thesis Socrates before the jury. To what extent do you think Socrates is correct in saying that philosophy does not consist of positive wisdom?
His conversation with Meletus, however, is a poor example of this method, as it seems more directed toward embarrassing Meletus than toward arriving at the truth.
Certainly, Socrates, the wisest of men, has lived faultlessly. Socrates is found guilty by a narrow margin and is asked to propose a penalty. He also warns the jurymen who voted against him that in silencing their critic rather than listening to him, they have harmed themselves much more than they have harmed him.
He sets up the model of the philosopher as one who does not have any specialized knowledge, but who is instead well- skilled at revealing the ignorance of others.
Rather than provide arguments in his defense, Socrates insists solely on speaking the truth, which he feels should be sufficient to acquit him if only the jury were just.
Getting acquitted is completely immaterial to him. They are maxims more than substantial claims, and cannot really be verified or disproved. This tradition includes Aristotle, Descartes, Kant, Hegel, and most other major philosophers.
These activities earned him much admiration amongst the youth of Athens, but much hatred and anger from the people he embarrassed.
He explains that his behavior stems from a prophecy by the oracle at Delphi which claimed that he was the wisest of all men. These philosophers see the role of philosophy as one of provoking and critiquing thought without building any positive assertions of its own.
Certainly, he seems to accept his condemnation, but we see in his many rhetorical flourishes and his merciless attack on Meletus that pure truth is not his only aim.
This is the only instance in The Apology of the elenchus, or cross-examination, which is so central to most Platonic dialogues. Socrates points out that he has always been consistent in his behavior and his values, and he would be doing himself a great injustice to be inconsistent now.
In order to spread this peculiar wisdom, Socrates explains that he considered it his duty to question supposed "wise" men and to expose their false wisdom as ignorance.
Certainly, this can be said of his claim that Platos apology thesis unexamined life is not worth living. The only thing of importance is the truth. He explains that he has no experience with the law courts and that he will instead speak in the manner to which he is accustomed: If he was not, what effect was he trying to exert on the jury?Home Essays Platos Apology.
Platos Apology. Topics: Plato PHLH5 Plato's Philosophy in Apology Plato was known to be one of Socrates' students, and knew him for over 40 years. Although Plato's version of Apology is popularly believed to be (the most accurate) historical recount of what happened in B.C on the day of Socrates'.
Apology- Plato essays "Socrates is a doer of evil and corrupter of the youth, and he does not believe in the gods of the state. He has other new divinities of his own."(Apology 41) In The Apology, by Plato, these are the accusations brought against Socrates during his trial.
Oct 25, · In Apology, Plato tells the story of Socrates’ trial, describing his behavior and his unique defense during the trial process. Socrates is innocent because his philosophic thought is useful for Athenians.
He has been wrongly accused.5/5(3). Socrates is quite explicit on this question. Getting acquitted is completely immaterial to him. The only thing of importance is the truth. Rather than provide arguments in his defense, Socrates insists solely on speaking the truth, which he feels should be sufficient to acquit him if only the jury were just.
Oct 25, · Prompt: In the Apology, Socrates claims that he is the best kind of citizen. How does he justify this claim?
Do you find his argument convincing? Why or why not? Be sure to anticipate counter-arguments and respond to them. Is this a strong thesis statement (I feel like it is a little general, but I.
Kevin Langieri February 1, Philosophy of Human Nature Professor Gregor Topic 1: Plato’s Apology This paper examines the significance of Socrates’ opening lines in Plato’s Apology. Socrates’ opening lines establish the key points of his defense, which he explains in further detail as his dialogue continues.Download