As an elementary school student, I had no interest in creative works whatsoever. He explains the hierarchy of subjects in education, beginning at the top with mathematics and languages, followed by humanities and at the bottom are the arts.
He suggests that by grouping students by age, delivering a standard curriculum, and testing them against standardized criteria, schools are essentially diminishing the individuality and creativity of students. As children grow up, we start to educate them progressively from the waist up.
Remember being a kid and wanting to play around? What do you expect? At the top are mathematics and languages, then the humanities, and at the bottom are the arts. He is also creating a distinction between literacy and creativity, suggesting that somehow schools value one but not the other.
These fields are what many educational institutions consider the most successful fields of work to go into. But is that fair, or true?
By previously providing solutions to the issue and using a strong ending, the audience is motivated to fix this issue.
Furthermore, in other areas of creativity, schools excel. He suggests that some of the most creative answers involve imagining a paperclip that is 30 feet high. A normal classroom with cheerful faces. A highly literate person can become hugely creative in the production of written works.
It is not the case that schools favor literacy Do schools kill creativity essay creativity. I want to cherish my brilliant mind. We think visually, we think in sound, we think kinesthetically. Creativity is seeing things in new ways, breaking barriers that stood in front of you for some time.
At the end of the day, any one high school student might take maybe one or two semesters of a class specializing in their preferred art - alongside six years of structure.
There were no public systems of education before the 19th Century; all of them came into being to meet the needs of the Industrial Revolution. We are being educated for the promise of money. I can testify that everyone has potential to be creative, and all you need is some way to unlock it.
I understand that memorizing is the fastest way to get good grades, get into a good college, and get a job which we equate with a good life. Education is also about students exploring themselves, enlightening their interests and becoming the person they really want to be in life, not just what their teachers, classmates, nor what the system expects from them.
I started out horrible. If everyone thought the same way and followed the same path in life, how would different subjects be able to advance? He explains that all people have an interest in education, it goes deep with people the same way religion and money does.
I had an unhealthy obsession with video games that dominated every aspect of my being. Somewhere in our battle and pursuit of meaningless papers, diplomas and money, we have lost the true meaning of learning. Years continue to pass, some students graduate, some fail out, some drop out and nothing really changes.
They should be centered first and foremost.
He argues that public schools around the world emphasize on forming left-brained students in order to meet the needs of industrialism. Is it because we have forgotten how to use our creative minds? Also, as Robinson says, society does emphasize on academic success and seems to forget about things such as the arts.
The education system reminds me of a dictator that is unwilling to step down. The systems are not giving any value towards the liberal art subjects for example, dance, music, and photography. This is a strength of education, not a weakness. Many creative thinkers get through high school and go onto college.
Its essence is in its freshness and the ability to make dreams come to life. Students all over the world have had more years of schooling than they care to count. I never want to be a product living my life inside a box. The control of education should be in the hands of students. So, despite the implication Robinson make to the contrary, focusing on the needs of individual learners has been a common goal of education for centuries.Read this essay on Schools Kill Creativity.
Come browse our large digital warehouse of free sample essays. Get the knowledge you need in order to pass your classes and more. Only at mi-centre.com". Robinson’s TED talk, Do Schools Kill Creativity? emphasizes on this with a use of argumentative techniques and structure, which assist in making his presentation strong and convincing along with memorable and distinguishable.
Aug 28, · Do Schools Kill Creativity – A Response to Ken Robinson By BRENT SILBY Robinson argues that schools are primarily concerned with conformity and that this has a. We will write a custom essay sample on Schools Kills Creativity specifically for you for only $ $/page.
Order now Schools Kill Creativity Summary ; Do Schools Kill Creativity ; Schools Killing Creativity ; What Is Creativity To You? Promote Creativity And Creative Learning. How Schools Are Killing Creativity.
In his TED Talk "Do Schools Kill Creativity?" Sir Ken Robinson said that instead of growing into creativity in school, we grow out of it. Students all over. I fully agree with what Sir Ken Robinson says in the aspect that schools do indeed kill creativity.
He says that creativity should be treated with the same importance as literacy but I strongly feel that this is not the case with most schools/5(1).Download