The reality is that homosexuality is multidimensional, and is much more about love and affection than it is about sex.
When, for example, in many species of primates, a subordinate male is faced with aggression by a dominant male, the dominant male will bite the subordinate, causing him to squeal in pain, drop the food or the female and present his rump.
LGBT individuals can still be fired, simply for being who they are. So what happened to tradition? Since marriage can be viewed as both a religious institution and a civil procedure, people disagree about whether religious organizations or the government should be entitled to delimit and regulate marriage.
So the notion that someone can be changed from straight to gay is quite unlikely. Gay marriage and its associated promotion of homosexuality would undermine western civilization.
With the discussion still hinging on "abstinence only" versus comprehensive approachesthe issue of queer inclusion has yet to be settled across the board.
The reality is that it is so common that it begs for an explanation, and sociobiologists have proposed a wide variety of explanations to account for it. Unlike their counterparts, heterosexuals and their relationships are universally accepted by major religious denominations.
Of course, the all time favorite among those fearmongering tactics is that logical fallacy called the slippery-slope argument, described briefly above. If gay people really want to get married, all they have to do is to become straight and marry someone of the opposite sex. Increasingly, the perception is that gay couples cannot naturally procreate and they will most likely adopt children.
Other players were the usual suspects, the Catholic church, several of the more conservative Protestant denominations, the American Family Association, Focus On The Family, their various political subsidiary groups, and a whole host of smaller right-wing political and religious organizations, including a few out-right hate groups.
Gays and lesbians can also be granted the rights to legal marriage in order to ensure that all citizens enjoy full human rights. In other words, this is like arguing that you should not expect legal protection from being persecuted because you are a Mormon or a Catholic; the solution to such disadvantage or persecution is simple: The Anti-Gay-Marriage Propaganda Effort The Players That the organized opposition to gay marriage is primarily from groups with an obvious homophobic agenda should be self evident if one looks at who they are and what they are doing outside of the arena of the gay marriage debate.
At the end of the day, the opposition to gay marriage stems ultimately from a deep-seated homophobia in American culture, borne almost entirely out of religious prejudice.
Queer people are often provided inadequate health care because of stigma and discrimination. That is why the individuals who are well against gay marriages are for the opinion that saving families and society will generally consider having gay marriages not legalized.
This argument promoting the aspect of gay marriage is on the fact that each human being has a profound right of living the way they want to. Lots and lots of scientific studies have shown that the outcomes of the children raised in the homes of gay and lesbian couples are just as good as those of straight couples.
This means that many of the same people who are even passionately in favor of gay rights oppose gays on this one issue. The second argument raised for this is that it is a critical contributor to moral degradation.
That is the United States constitution, whose 14th Amendment states that all persons are entitled to equal protection of the law, and it makes no exceptions for gays, as the U. Take, for example, one of the most popular anti-gay-marriage web sites out there, one so frequently clicked-on that it frequently comes to the top of Google results, the "Ten Arguments" page at nogaymarriage.
Many mainstream Christian denominations, to be sure, and definitely most branches of Islam and Orthodox Judaism, but outside those, most religions are unopposed to gay marriage, and many actually favor it. But that is why constitutional government was established -- to ensure that powerless, unpopular minorities are still protected from the tyranny of the majority.
And if tolerance itself is not acceptable, what is the absence of tolerance? Again, such an argument fails to persuade based on the marriages society does allow routinely, without even a second thought. It is why, in September ofDavid Cameron, the British Prime Minister, in addressing the convention of his Conservative Party, addressed these values in his announcement of his plans for a gay marriage law in Britain.
There are also a lot of stereotypes about gay relationships, and even a great deal of misunderstanding of what marriage itself is all about. That fact alone shows how false this argument really is.
You will not need to put any effort toward get a perfect paper. Many religions also view same sex marriages as immoral and if gays and lesbians are legalized the church would be offended since marriage is an institution supposed to be holy and ordained by God.
Many make valuable contributions to their communities, serving on school boards, volunteering in community charities, and trying to be good citizens. Now, after having seen the benefits to the partners and to society, they are overwhelmingly in favor, according to the surveys done then and now.
Societies have long recognized that allowing civil rights to certain groups may offend some, and at times, even the majority. But there is a looming problem for the anti-gay-marriage crowd. This means that the only thing which needs to be taken into consideration in such a marriage is love p.
Texasthey are still dreamed of by those who would seek to legalize discrimination against gays - and are occasionally still enforced in some states, in spite of the fact that the laws have been invalidated and doing so is quite illegal and opens the state to civil lawsuit.
This is something that few heterosexuals can understand unless they are a minority themselves. If it is the institution of heterosexual marriage that worries you, then consider that no one would require you or anyone else to participate in a gay marriage.Same-Sex Marriage Should Be Legal Essay Words | 8 Pages.
freedom. For the past decade or so, the topic of same-sex marriage seems to have created another conflict over the definition of freedom.
Gay marriage should be legal because as woman and man, all individuals have the same right in society; because same-sex couples can constitute a good based family; because it is just a way to make official a common union nowadays, even with the religious issue; because it is not related to polygamy; and because love matters and it does not.
Gay marriage is banned in most areas of the world. This is an ethical issue that is these people face every day. Bible quote deeming it a sin or a sign decked out in the many colors of the rainbow which is the universal flag for gays.
[tags: Same-Sex Marriage Essays] $40 million, per year in taxes. Gays and lesbians would not gain. Many in favor of same-sex marriage suggest that gay couples should have the same marital benefits as heterosexual couples, which is simply a civil rights issue.
In contrast, those against same-sex marriage see this concept as a moral matter, which violates traditional ethical standards. Free Essay: Should Same Sex Marriages Be Allowed? An ongoing debate: Should gay and lesbian couples be allowed to legally marry?
In the opposing articles. Gay marriage is also referred to as same sex marriage. Same sex relationships occur when men and women are attracted to someone of the same gender as themselves. Gay Marriage Essay / Research Paper Example. June 23, Many people in the society view gays and lesbians as immoral people since traditional belief of a marriage in the .Download